<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The great Thunderbird experiment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/18/the-great-thunderbird-experiment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/18/the-great-thunderbird-experiment/</link>
	<description>Bits on the rampage: Eric Shepherd's blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Wilsher</title>
		<link>http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/18/the-great-thunderbird-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-834</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Wilsher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/18/the-great-thunderbird-experiment/#comment-834</guid>
		<description>I fully agree with the address book.  I'm thinking about offering peterv some assistance if it's wanted because I would love for that to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully agree with the address book.  I&#8217;m thinking about offering peterv some assistance if it&#8217;s wanted because I would love for that to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sheppy</title>
		<link>http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/18/the-great-thunderbird-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-826</link>
		<dc:creator>sheppy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 14:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/18/the-great-thunderbird-experiment/#comment-826</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I've seen that.  I just keep waiting for 203927 to actually land.  Anywhere. :)

I will go through all these articles in a day or two and submit bugs for anything that's not already in Bugzilla.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;ve seen that.  I just keep waiting for 203927 to actually land.  Anywhere. <img src='http://www.bitstampede.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I will go through all these articles in a day or two and submit bugs for anything that&#8217;s not already in Bugzilla.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smokey Ardisson</title>
		<link>http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/18/the-great-thunderbird-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-821</link>
		<dc:creator>Smokey Ardisson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 07:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/18/the-great-thunderbird-experiment/#comment-821</guid>
		<description>You want peterv's bug 203927 (and some follow-ups, I'm sure) here, if you haven't found it yet in your searches....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You want peterv&#8217;s bug 203927 (and some follow-ups, I&#8217;m sure) here, if you haven&#8217;t found it yet in your searches&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ludovic</title>
		<link>http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/18/the-great-thunderbird-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-820</link>
		<dc:creator>Ludovic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 07:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/18/the-great-thunderbird-experiment/#comment-820</guid>
		<description>Do you plan to open bugs also ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you plan to open bugs also ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sheppy</title>
		<link>http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/18/the-great-thunderbird-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-811</link>
		<dc:creator>sheppy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 21:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/18/the-great-thunderbird-experiment/#comment-811</guid>
		<description>iChat's interface to the address book sucks, but supposedly has been redone for iChat 4, which will come with Leopard next year.  iChat doesn't actually use the Address Book's UI, but has its own really dreadful UI.

Thing is, apps can have their own UI.  Address Book can be treated as a database.  You could keep the same address book UI you have in Thunderbird now, just storing the data in the standard OS X address book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iChat&#8217;s interface to the address book sucks, but supposedly has been redone for iChat 4, which will come with Leopard next year.  iChat doesn&#8217;t actually use the Address Book&#8217;s UI, but has its own really dreadful UI.</p>
<p>Thing is, apps can have their own UI.  Address Book can be treated as a database.  You could keep the same address book UI you have in Thunderbird now, just storing the data in the standard OS X address book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Ruderman</title>
		<link>http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/18/the-great-thunderbird-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Ruderman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 21:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/18/the-great-thunderbird-experiment/#comment-810</guid>
		<description>On the other hand, when I use Thunderbird on Windows, I don't use the address book feature at all.  So maybe I don't care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the other hand, when I use Thunderbird on Windows, I don&#8217;t use the address book feature at all.  So maybe I don&#8217;t care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Ruderman</title>
		<link>http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/18/the-great-thunderbird-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Ruderman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 21:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/18/the-great-thunderbird-experiment/#comment-808</guid>
		<description>The only app I've used that tried to use the Mac OS X address book is iChat.  The UI for adding an AIM user to my buddy list was horrible, and it seemed to be horrible because iChat uses the Mac OS X address book.  Thunderbird should not switch to using the Mac OS X address book if it requires harming the UI as much as it did in iChat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only app I&#8217;ve used that tried to use the Mac OS X address book is iChat.  The UI for adding an AIM user to my buddy list was horrible, and it seemed to be horrible because iChat uses the Mac OS X address book.  Thunderbird should not switch to using the Mac OS X address book if it requires harming the UI as much as it did in iChat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Accettura</title>
		<link>http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/18/the-great-thunderbird-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-794</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Accettura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 15:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/18/the-great-thunderbird-experiment/#comment-794</guid>
		<description>Sometimes I wonder if it would be better to just drop Thunderbird's AB on Mac/Windows and use the OS included address book for better integration with the OS.  Would then give us things like sync ability for the given OS's, and other features that AB inherits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes I wonder if it would be better to just drop Thunderbird&#8217;s AB on Mac/Windows and use the OS included address book for better integration with the OS.  Would then give us things like sync ability for the given OS&#8217;s, and other features that AB inherits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
