<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TB experiment: window overload</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/19/tb-experiment-window-overload/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/19/tb-experiment-window-overload/</link>
	<description>Bits on the rampage: Eric Shepherd's blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: sheppy</title>
		<link>http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/19/tb-experiment-window-overload/#comment-1125</link>
		<dc:creator>sheppy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 04:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/19/tb-experiment-window-overload/#comment-1125</guid>
		<description>TB2 is starting to look a lot better, although I've not put it through its paces yet.  I may do a second attempt at this experiment when TB2 reaches beta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TB2 is starting to look a lot better, although I&#8217;ve not put it through its paces yet.  I may do a second attempt at this experiment when TB2 reaches beta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/19/tb-experiment-window-overload/#comment-1124</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 04:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/19/tb-experiment-window-overload/#comment-1124</guid>
		<description>"Iâ€™d actually like the top of the folder list box to move down to line up with the top of the message list."

If you want the two panes to line up, remove the Search Bar (View &#62; Toolbars).

P.S. Thanks for documenting your experience with Thunderbird. Like you, I periodically try it out. So far it hasn't convinced me to stay put, although it has promise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Iâ€™d actually like the top of the folder list box to move down to line up with the top of the message list.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you want the two panes to line up, remove the Search Bar (View &gt; Toolbars).</p>
<p>P.S. Thanks for documenting your experience with Thunderbird. Like you, I periodically try it out. So far it hasn&#8217;t convinced me to stay put, although it has promise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Glazman</title>
		<link>http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/19/tb-experiment-window-overload/#comment-845</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Glazman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 07:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/19/tb-experiment-window-overload/#comment-845</guid>
		<description>then it's trivial !!! just add a new filter to your inbox catching all mails having a Content-Type field or a body containing "iso-2022-jp" and moving it to the junk folder !!! That will catch almost all japonese messages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>then it&#8217;s trivial !!! just add a new filter to your inbox catching all mails having a Content-Type field or a body containing &#8220;iso-2022-jp&#8221; and moving it to the junk folder !!! That will catch almost all japonese messages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sheppy</title>
		<link>http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/19/tb-experiment-window-overload/#comment-844</link>
		<dc:creator>sheppy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 03:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/19/tb-experiment-window-overload/#comment-844</guid>
		<description>I don't have any friends that send mail in iso-2022-jp, so I'd like messages sent in that automatically classified as junk. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have any friends that send mail in iso-2022-jp, so I&#8217;d like messages sent in that automatically classified as junk. <img src='http://www.bitstampede.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Ruderman</title>
		<link>http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/19/tb-experiment-window-overload/#comment-843</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Ruderman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 02:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/19/tb-experiment-window-overload/#comment-843</guid>
		<description>I agree about the sending progress window.  See bug 218557.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree about the sending progress window.  See bug 218557.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Glazman</title>
		<link>http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/19/tb-experiment-window-overload/#comment-842</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Glazman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 01:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/19/tb-experiment-window-overload/#comment-842</guid>
		<description>No, you cannot assume that a message written in a given charset is always spam only based on the charset. Your Japanese contacts will also send mails in english in iso-2022-jp because that charset contains ascii chars. So a spam filter for a charset like iso-2022-jp should at least compute the ratio between ascii (if existing in that charset) and non-ascii chars and decide if it's a spam or not if the ratio is too low.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, you cannot assume that a message written in a given charset is always spam only based on the charset. Your Japanese contacts will also send mails in english in iso-2022-jp because that charset contains ascii chars. So a spam filter for a charset like iso-2022-jp should at least compute the ratio between ascii (if existing in that charset) and non-ascii chars and decide if it&#8217;s a spam or not if the ratio is too low.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dao</title>
		<link>http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/19/tb-experiment-window-overload/#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator>Dao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/19/tb-experiment-window-overload/#comment-835</guid>
		<description>&#62; Likewise, I donâ€™t want alerts to pop up every time an account
&#62; connection times out.  This happens all the time, and I just donâ€™t
&#62; care.  I want it to fail silently, with, again, maybe an icon that
&#62; appears in the status bar that I can click for details on any errors
&#62; that have occurred.

An alternative would be to use Firefox' yellow notification boxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Likewise, I donâ€™t want alerts to pop up every time an account<br />
&gt; connection times out.  This happens all the time, and I just donâ€™t<br />
&gt; care.  I want it to fail silently, with, again, maybe an icon that<br />
&gt; appears in the status bar that I can click for details on any errors<br />
&gt; that have occurred.</p>
<p>An alternative would be to use Firefox&#8217; yellow notification boxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sheppy</title>
		<link>http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/19/tb-experiment-window-overload/#comment-833</link>
		<dc:creator>sheppy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/19/tb-experiment-window-overload/#comment-833</guid>
		<description>Actually, what would be a huge help would be tooltips on each item in the about:config window that would explain what that setting does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, what would be a huge help would be tooltips on each item in the about:config window that would explain what that setting does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hansen</title>
		<link>http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/19/tb-experiment-window-overload/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/19/tb-experiment-window-overload/#comment-832</guid>
		<description>Yay, you're still going strong - cool!

&#62; ...wish we didnâ€™t have to use the about:config type window for so much stuff.
We all want something different. That's the cool part.

It should just get a bit more beginner-friendly and less bugging; like you stated; less OK-popups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay, you&#8217;re still going strong - cool!</p>
<p>&gt; &#8230;wish we didnâ€™t have to use the about:config type window for so much stuff.<br />
We all want something different. That&#8217;s the cool part.</p>
<p>It should just get a bit more beginner-friendly and less bugging; like you stated; less OK-popups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sheppy</title>
		<link>http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/19/tb-experiment-window-overload/#comment-830</link>
		<dc:creator>sheppy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitstampede.com/2006/09/19/tb-experiment-window-overload/#comment-830</guid>
		<description>Hey, there we go.  Thanks!

This is the kind of thing that makes me wish we didn't have to use the about:config type window for so much stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, there we go.  Thanks!</p>
<p>This is the kind of thing that makes me wish we didn&#8217;t have to use the about:config type window for so much stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
