<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What are we measuring here, anyway?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bitstampede.com/2007/11/20/what-are-we-measuring-here-anyway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bitstampede.com/2007/11/20/what-are-we-measuring-here-anyway/</link>
	<description>Bits on the rampage: Eric Shepherd's blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: funTomas</title>
		<link>http://www.bitstampede.com/2007/11/20/what-are-we-measuring-here-anyway/#comment-48707</link>
		<dc:creator>funTomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitstampede.com/2007/11/20/what-are-we-measuring-here-anyway/#comment-48707</guid>
		<description>Interesting, how on the Earth anybody can mistake mem use for CPU usage? The question might seem trivial at first, but isn't this type of confusion to blame for Firefox memory leak complaint "fad"? Anyway, aren't the MacDeveleopers pride themselves on design superiority over the Win design? Where's the usability?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, how on the Earth anybody can mistake mem use for CPU usage? The question might seem trivial at first, but isn&#8217;t this type of confusion to blame for Firefox memory leak complaint &#8220;fad&#8221;? Anyway, aren&#8217;t the MacDeveleopers pride themselves on design superiority over the Win design? Where&#8217;s the usability?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
