Comments on: I’m back. Sorta. http://www.bitstampede.com/2008/02/04/im-back-sorta/ Bits on the rampage: Eric Shepherd's blog. Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:15:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Sevenspade http://www.bitstampede.com/2008/02/04/im-back-sorta/#comment-67484 Sevenspade Sat, 09 Feb 2008 23:26:03 +0000 http://www.bitstampede.com/2008/02/04/im-back-sorta/#comment-67484 You guys are silly. <blockquote>I wouldn’t mind it so much if it wasn’t so hard to find the link. .&nbsp. If it was nice and prominent at the top. . . it'd be much better.</blockquote> They <em>are</em> at the top. The pages will <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.mdc/browse_thread/thread/97d4e6b76da74300#236017ae9b57e04e" title="Core JavaScript Reference not so useful anymore" rel="nofollow">likely be remerged</a>, or at least transcluded back into their respective constructors' pages, although differently than it was done before. You guys are silly.

I wouldn’t mind it so much if it wasn’t so hard to find the link. .&nbsp. If it was nice and prominent at the top. . . it’d be much better.

They are at the top.

The pages will likely be remerged, or at least transcluded back into their respective constructors’ pages, although differently than it was done before.

]]> By: Eevee http://www.bitstampede.com/2008/02/04/im-back-sorta/#comment-66580 Eevee Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:51:46 +0000 http://www.bitstampede.com/2008/02/04/im-back-sorta/#comment-66580 Agreed; the separate page would be fine if it weren't such a colossal pain to figure out where to look the first time. Agreed; the separate page would be fine if it weren’t such a colossal pain to figure out where to look the first time.

]]> By: Mossop http://www.bitstampede.com/2008/02/04/im-back-sorta/#comment-66579 Mossop Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:47:05 +0000 http://www.bitstampede.com/2008/02/04/im-back-sorta/#comment-66579 I am one of those who has commented about the separation of the prototype documentation. I can see that it is correct and really I wouldn't mind it so much if it wasn't so hard to find the link to the prototype section, it seems buried way down in the page. If it was nice and prominent at the top, preferably named differently like "object methods" or some such it'd be much better. I am one of those who has commented about the separation of the prototype documentation. I can see that it is correct and really I wouldn’t mind it so much if it wasn’t so hard to find the link to the prototype section, it seems buried way down in the page. If it was nice and prominent at the top, preferably named differently like “object methods” or some such it’d be much better.

]]>