<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Firefox 3.6 documentation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bitstampede.com/2009/09/22/more-firefox-3-6-documentation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bitstampede.com/2009/09/22/more-firefox-3-6-documentation/</link>
	<description>Bits on the rampage: Eric Shepherd's blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:12:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spatt</title>
		<link>http://www.bitstampede.com/2009/09/22/more-firefox-3-6-documentation/comment-page-1/#comment-84698</link>
		<dc:creator>Spatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitstampede.com/?p=846#comment-84698</guid>
		<description>Firefox is awesome. Period.
It gets even better in 3.6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox is awesome. Period.<br />
It gets even better in 3.6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: disappointed</title>
		<link>http://www.bitstampede.com/2009/09/22/more-firefox-3-6-documentation/comment-page-1/#comment-84489</link>
		<dc:creator>disappointed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitstampede.com/?p=846#comment-84489</guid>
		<description>I very disappointed that Mozilla has decided to abandon a complete open source for collaboration, Mediawiki, and adopt a closed source product, MindTouch 2009 Standard. So much for &lt;em&gt;open web&lt;/em&gt;.

MindTouch 2009 Standard is clearly not an open source product and their &lt;i&gt;open source&lt;/i&gt; is basic and clearly crippled. They even go to the extreme of promoting their pay for products as closed source as an advantage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I very disappointed that Mozilla has decided to abandon a complete open source for collaboration, Mediawiki, and adopt a closed source product, MindTouch 2009 Standard. So much for <em>open web</em>.</p>
<p>MindTouch 2009 Standard is clearly not an open source product and their <i>open source</i> is basic and clearly crippled. They even go to the extreme of promoting their pay for products as closed source as an advantage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
